Teaching Swing Decisions: How to Build Hitters Who Know When to Say No
- John Gafford
- Jul 30
- 12 min read
Why plate discipline is a trainable skill—and how modern programs are finally getting it right.
Everyone Talks About Swing Decisions, But Almost No One Trains Them
If you walk through a minor league hitting meeting or sit in on a college pregame talk, you’ll hear the phrase “swing decisions” tossed around like candy.
“Make good decisions.”
“Don’t chase.”
“Stay in your zone.”
“Win pitches.”
The message is repeated at every level. It’s well-intentioned. It’s not wrong. But it’s also not instruction.
Because here’s the problem: while everyone in baseball talks about swing decisions, almost no one actually teaches them.
They’re discussed the way hustle and leadership used to be — as if they’re either there or they’re not. As if some hitters are born with an eye and others aren’t. As if patience is personality, not process.
In reality, swing decisions are a trainable skill. They can be built, improved, and shaped with intention. They’re driven by timing, vision, cognition, confidence, and clarity of plan. And like any skill, they require reps — not just reminders.
But most hitting environments aren’t built for that. They’re built for mechanics. For damage. For results. Most hitters are trained to react to pitches they can hit, not to hunt pitches they want to hit. And that difference is everything.
This is especially true at the amateur and developmental levels, where the cage culture is built around contact, not context. Players are praised for loud swings, not smart takes. A hitter who swings at everything and barrels 5 out of 10 might “look good,” while the one who takes five borderline balls and hammers one may get overlooked.
It’s a systemic issue — not a talent one.
This post aims to close that gap. To move swing decisions out of the lecture and into the cage. We’ll look at what good decision-making actually is, how it can be trained, and how coaches can reinforce it without killing a hitter’s aggression.
Because at the highest levels, plate discipline isn’t optional — it’s survival. And if we want hitters to develop with that in mind, we have to start teaching it like it matters.
Now. Not after they fail.
What a “Good Swing Decision” Actually Is
Most people define a good swing decision statistically:
Z-Swing% (swing rate at pitches in the zone)
O-Swing% (swing rate at pitches out of the zone)
Swing/Takes categorized by result and location
Those numbers matter — but they only tell part of the story.
A truly good swing decision is contextual, not just spatial. It’s not just whether the pitch was in the strike zone. It’s whether it was in your zone — in the count, the situation, and the approach you had that at-bat.
It’s also about intent. Many bad decisions come from hitters being undecided, not wrong. They’re guessing. They’re reacting without a plan. And when hitters don’t know what they’re looking for, the default becomes “swing and hope.” That’s not aggression. That’s survival mode.
Let’s break down what actually defines a good decision in real-world terms.
It’s Swinging at a Pitch You’re On Time For
Timing isn’t optional — it’s part of the decision. If a hitter swings at a fastball he wasn’t ready for, that’s not a “strike” in development terms. It’s a rushed, compromised move that’s unlikely to produce hard contact.
A good decision is one where the hitter saw the pitch early, loaded on time, and let the swing go from a balanced position. That doesn’t mean he crushes it. But it means he meant to swing — not just had to.
It’s a Pitch You Can Drive With Your Swing Type
Not every strike is a hitter’s pitch. A low-away fastball might be hittable, but if your swing is built for high-and-pull damage, it’s a low-percentage swing. Elite decision-makers learn to pass on strikes they can’t do anything with. They don’t waste bullets.
This is why one-size-fits-all strike zone training can fail. If two hitters chase the same pitch, the feedback may need to be different. For one, it’s a bad swing decision. For the other, it’s the right swing with the wrong plan.
Good decisions start with knowing your swing and only attacking pitches that allow it to show up.
It’s a Decision That Matches the Count and Situation
A 1–0 fastball down the middle is not the same as a 3–2 slider an inch off. In some counts, you expand a little. In others, you shrink your zone. A hitter who swings at the same pitch in every count isn’t aggressive — he’s predictable.
This is where “discipline” and “approach” intersect. Decision-making isn’t static — it’s dynamic based on leverage. Coaches who understand this stop asking, “Why did you swing at that?” and start asking, “Why that pitch, in that count, with that situation?”
Good swing decisions are often made before the pitch is thrown — through plan, not just reaction.
It’s a Confident Yes — Not a Late Maybe
Some of the worst swings you’ll see in a game aren’t “chases” in the usual sense. They’re half-swings at pitches that were technically strikes, but that the hitter never fully committed to.
That hesitation comes from indecision — from a poor pre-pitch plan or unclear read. The hitter was thinking “maybe,” and “maybe” is death. A late “yes” is just a bad “no.”
Training better swing decisions means training hitters to load with clarity, so that when they go, it’s deliberate. If it’s not a “yes” early, it should become a “no” fast.
It’s Measured by Process, Not Just Result
This is the part coaches get wrong most often.
A swing that leads to hard contact isn’t automatically a good decision — especially if it came on a pitch outside the approach or zone plan. And a take that leads to a called strike might still be correct — especially if the pitch was outside the damage window.
If you only reward outcomes, you’ll train inconsistency. You’ll accidentally reinforce the chase because “he hit it hard,” and punish discipline because “he struck out looking.”
But if you reward the right decision, regardless of the result, you train conviction.
And conviction, not caution, is what builds plate discipline that lasts.
Building Recognition — How to Train the Eye
You can’t make good swing decisions if you can’t see what you’re swinging at — not just with your eyes, but with your brain. The first step in developing elite plate discipline isn’t mechanics or mindset. It’s visual clarity: recognizing pitch type, location, and movement early enough to act with intent.
This is a skill. And like any skill, it can be trained.
But most hitters never get the reps they need. In traditional cage work, everything looks the same: perfect flips, consistent BP fastballs, no variability. Vision doesn’t have to work. Timing doesn’t have to adapt. Every swing is a green light, regardless of the pitch.
Then the game starts, and the hitter’s brain is expected to process tunneling, sequencing, and late movement at game speed — with zero exposure to it in practice.
If we want better decisions, we have to train the eye, not just the bat.
Train for Pitch Type Recognition
The foundation of swing decisions is pitch recognition. That means training the hitter to:
Pick up spin, velocity, and trajectory out of the hand
Recognize the difference between a fastball vs. breaking ball vs. offspeed
Map each pitch’s typical entry point and movement pattern
Tools like Win Reality, GameSense, or even short-distance bullpen reads help players build this catalog over time. But it doesn’t require software. Even basic drills — like calling out pitch type without swinging — train early visual categorization.
If a hitter can’t name what he saw, he’s reacting, not deciding.
Use Variability — Not Predictability — in Training
The brain learns through surprise. If every pitch in practice is the same speed, same tunnel, same result, decision-making shuts off. The hitter moves into autopilot.
To force recognition, training should include:
Random pitch sequences (fastball, curve, changeup in random order)
Variable machine settings (location, speed, spin axis)
Disguised velocity changes (alternating between similar-looking fastballs with 5–8 mph difference)
You’re not trying to trick the hitter. You’re trying to require him to see the pitch before he swings. The goal isn’t success. It’s exposure.
Create “Decision Reps” Without a Swing
Sometimes the best way to train recognition is to remove the swing entirely. If the bat is an option, the brain defaults to action. If you take it away, you’re left with only the decision process.
Useful drills include:
Stand-in reps against bullpens or machines: read pitch, call type/location out loud
“Yes/No” tracking drills: hitter loads like normal and verbalizes swing/no-swing before pitch reaches plate
Rapid fire tracking rounds: hitter sees 8–10 pitches in a row, no swing, calls ball/strike quickly
These drills isolate vision and force the hitter to practice restraint, not just reaction.
Train the Brain, Not Just the Eyes
Recognition is visual, but it’s also cognitive. The best hitters don’t just see — they process fast.
Cognitive reaction training tools can include:
Strobe glasses (disrupt timing to improve visual processing)
Neuro-tracking apps (like NeuroTracker or Reflexion)
Visual load drills: add distractions or cues mid-delivery to train focus under complexity
These are advanced tools, and not always necessary. But they highlight a growing truth in player development: good hitters aren’t just physically fast — they’re neurologically efficient.
Reinforce Recognition in Every Environment
The biggest mistake coaches make? Separating “visual training” from the rest of hitting. The reality is: every swing is a visual decision. So every environment is a chance to build that skill.
This means:
Using live ABs to track decisions, not just results
Offering feedback on pitch type recognition (“What did you see there?”)
Building in rest periods where the hitter is watching others and calling pitches
Using tech tools (like swing tracking) to verify whether good takes are actually good reads
If you want hitters who make better decisions, train their vision every day — not just in special drills.
The eye can be trained. And when it is, the bat starts swinging a lot less — and a lot smarter.
Developing the Filter — Swing Intention and Approach Training
Once a hitter can see the pitch, the next question becomes: should he swing at it?
This is where recognition turns into decision-making, and decision-making turns into approach. Vision is the input. Intention is the filter. Without it, a hitter may identify the pitch perfectly — and still make the wrong move.
This is one of the most misunderstood parts of hitter development. Coaches say, “Have a plan,” but never teach how to build one. Players are told, “Don’t chase,” but are never shown how to define their damage zones. And so they operate on feel and guesswork — reactive, not selective.
To improve swing decisions, coaches must help hitters develop a clear, situational filter. A decision tree that narrows the swing window based on pitch type, zone, count, and hitter profile.
Here’s how that filter is built.
Start With the Hitter’s Strengths — Not the Strike Zone
The traditional zone — top to bottom, inside to out — is too generic. Great decision-makers don’t just swing at strikes. They swing at their strikes.
The first step is identifying a hitter’s:
Most effective zones (based on exit velocity, launch angle, swing length)
Best pitch types to attack
Least effective contact zones (weak ground balls, chase misses)
Using heat maps, ball flight data, or even just video, coaches can build a custom “damage profile.” From there, the hitter builds an intent-based zone — a window they’re hunting, not just reacting to.
It’s not about passivity. It’s about precision.
Train Count-Based Adjustments
A good swing decision in a 3–1 count isn’t the same as one in an 0–2 count.
Great hitters change gears. They expand slightly when they have to. They shrink their window when they don’t. This is where discipline meets game awareness.
Coaches must train hitters to:
Sit on zones in advantage counts (2–0, 3–1)
Recognize trap pitches in protect counts (0–2, 1–2 sliders out of the zone)
Understand when to gamble and when to fight
One useful method is count-structured BP:
In 1–0 counts, only swing at FB middle-in
In 2–2 counts, expand slightly away but never up
In 0–2, foul-off simulation: live arm, protect zone, no chases
This builds context into the hitter’s internal clock — and into his decision filter.
Use Approach Rounds to Sharpen Swing Intention
Every hitter should know what he’s trying to do in the box before the pitch is thrown. “Get a good pitch to hit” is not a plan. “Hunt fastball up” is.
Approach rounds in the cage can include:
Zone-specific intent (e.g., “FB middle-middle or I take”)
Pitch-type hunting (e.g., “swing only if you think it’s spin and in your zone”)
Opposite-field game plans (e.g., “look away and drive right-center only”)
The goal is to train intentional passes, not just swings. Hitters learn to say no to pitches they could hit — because they’re not the ones they want.
This sharpens selectivity and builds conviction.
Challenge the Filter Under Pressure
It’s easy to make good decisions when there’s no cost. To build a real approach, players need consequences and pressure:
Live AB competitions with scoring based on decisions, not just contact
1-pitch rounds — if the hitter swings at a pitch outside his plan, he’s done
“Take It to Win” drills — hitter gets a point only if they take a non-damage pitch
These games simulate the stress of game environments, forcing players to trust their filters — not abandon them when they get anxious.
When hitters can stick to a plan under speed, fatigue, or competition, they’re getting close to game-ready discipline.
Build Confidence in Saying No
The final layer of the filter is mental. Many hitters know what they should swing at — but they don’t trust it. They’re afraid of taking strikes. Afraid of falling behind. Afraid of being passive.
But discipline is not passive. It’s selective aggression.
Coaches need to reinforce:
That a take can be a win
That walking away from a bad pitch is more valuable than a weak swing
That pitchers want you to expand — and saying no is control, not caution
The best decision-makers don’t just identify bad pitches — they believe they can get something better.
That’s the mindset that lets the filter hold up when it matters.
Feedback Loops — Coaching Language and Measurement That Reinforces the Skill
Once you’ve taught recognition and built a hitter’s decision filter, one critical challenge remains: reinforcing the skill over time without breaking it.
Swing decisions are fragile. One aggressive round of front-toss can unravel a week’s worth of discipline. One poor BP session — where a hitter gets praised for barreling a pitch he shouldn’t have swung at — can reset his filter. And if a player starts hearing the wrong feedback loop, it can lead to hesitation, frustration, or overcorrection.
So the final step in developing better swing decisions is creating the right feedback environment — one where coaches reinforce the plan, players stay anchored in intent, and success is measured by process, not just contact.
Here’s how elite coaches are doing it.
Redefine Success in Practice
If every round ends with “how many you barreled,” hitters will chase barrels — even on the wrong pitches. That encourages over-swinging and poor selectivity.
Instead, build practices where success is defined by:
Takes that align with the plan
Committed swings at the right pitches
Early recognition, even if the result is an out
For example, after a five-pitch round:
3 takes, 2 swings — if all were on-plan, that’s a win.
4 barrels, 1 weak grounder — if two swings were out-of-zone, that’s a teachable moment.
Discipline starts with what gets praised.
Give Real-Time, Specific Feedback on Decisions
Coaches should constantly give micro-feedback after reps:
“Good pass — that’s not the pitch we’re looking for.”
“Right zone, just a little early.”
“That’s a swing we want — stick with that plan.”
Avoid generic phrases like:
“Be more selective.”
“See it better.”
“Don’t chase.”
Instead, tie every cue back to the player’s stated approach:
“Was that pitch in your lane?”
“What were you hunting there?”
“Did you recognize spin early enough to make a decision?”
This builds self-awareness, not just coach-dependence.
Use Visuals and Trackers to Anchor Intent
Video clips and swing decision charts can be powerful when used well:
Clip the moment of load + decision to show recognition
Track swing/no-swing by pitch type and zone
Create swing decision heat maps from machine or live AB sessions
But don’t overdo it. The goal isn’t to overload the player. It’s to give him something concrete that matches what he felt — or missed.
The best feedback confirms feel, not replaces it.
Turn “Takes” Into Wins
If you want players to stop swinging at marginal pitches, you have to make taking them feel like a win.
This can be done through:
Decision games where players get points for takes inside their plan
Verbal reinforcement — “That’s exactly the pass we want there.”
Peer coaching — players calling out each other’s discipline in live ABs
Too often, hitters feel like taking a pitch is doing nothing. You have to flip that: in the right context, a take is control. A take is choosing to wait for something better.
That mindset shift is what builds real trust in the approach.
Reinforce Aggression Inside Discipline
One final — and crucial — point: reinforcing swing decisions should never turn players passive. The goal is aggressive selectivity, not hesitation.
Remind players often:
“We’re hunting, not avoiding.”
“We’re saying no so we can hammer yes.”
“When you go, go full. Just make sure it’s your pitch.”
The best decision-makers aren’t cautious. They’re decisive. They don’t swing less — they swing better. And that’s what every feedback loop should reinforce.
Final Thought
You can’t build swing discipline just by telling players to be disciplined. You have to train it — visually, physically, and mentally. You have to reward it. Challenge it. Reinforce it. And you have to keep doing it when the results aren’t immediate.
Because decision-making doesn’t show up in the cage — it shows up in the 7th inning when the at-bat counts.
That’s what you’re training for.

Comments